Lovense - wireless toys

Showing posts with label victimisation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label victimisation. Show all posts

Sunday, 4 July 2021

How biased and discrimanatory is social media

 No matter how much the social media platforms keep saying they are equal, support all genders, sexual preference and religions etc etc, fully behind LGBTQ / LGBTQ+, in practice its not.


I promised myself I wouldn't rant about the blatant preference and discrimination towards some gender types / sexual identifications.


Last week I tried to post 2 photos to my Instagram Account, and within seconds it was removed as it 'breached the guidlines on nudity and sexual content'.

Before i share the photo, bear i mind I have panties on, they are not sheer or seethrough in anyway, they are not so tight they clearly define and outline my boiclitty cock, which is not hard and obviously a cock. I do not promote any sexual activity, promotion or anything but myself.


I requested a review, which took several hours, and surprise surprise it was still removed for the Nudity and sexual content. I have appealed, but don't expect to get it even looked at (Instagram / Facebook say they get too many appeals to look at the all so just select a few to look at - totally fair system) as I am not a famous person or influencer with many thousands of followers. I am just me, trying to share and hopefully help others that are starting or on the journey of crossdressing, recognising that they are trans or coming out.

Going through my feed yesterday the following images popped up, they have been viewed by thousands, and have substantially more followers than me, but I am sure this has no bearing at all.


I am sure you can see, clearly see, why I am annoyed - very clear sexual content, very clear sexual organs in an aroused state and clear genitals, but both of these photos are OK - and this is a fair system?

Pardon my language, and tbh i am past caring if IG ban me again, but this is total bollocks. 

14/09/2021

Yet again Instagram, and Facebook, have shown their bias.

I logged into my IG account (www.instagram.com/lena_cdxd_bup) earlier today, and cleared my notifications,  messages and scrolled through my feed liking pictures etc, no trouble. Tried to log in again this afternoon to find that my account has been disabled, suspended and I can 'maybe' request a review in 24hours. No emails, no messages in fact no idea whatsoever as to what I have done wrong this time. Or is it just another gay persons account? There are photos of women posted all day every day that are far more revealing and sexual, barely hiding anything - tight/see through bra or bikini top, bikini or panties pulled into a tight camel toe.... leaning forwards showing full cleavage ... and more, all OK. But a gurly cd showing some bulge in her panties is to sexual and not allowed, really wtf!





Saturday, 8 May 2021

Censorship at its best, in what is meant to be a country with freedom of speech and expression

 So, if you haveclicked on my IG link in any previous blog posts, tweets or any other format you will no doubt have noticed that it has been suspended, closed by the Instagram / Facebook police due to 'nude, suggestive or selling of sexual activities posts'


What did I do, I posted a picture in my underwear, it wasn't sheer, it wasn't to small to hide anything, it just showed my gurly bulge!


According to the reviewers it was pornographic content.

As many of you will have noticed, there are regularly thousands of pictures posted everyday on IG that barely cover a women's nipples let alone her entire boobs, or panties that are so small, so tight that a camel toes doesn't describe it, you can see the lips and often the clitoris poking into the material, nude shots of them sitting back to the camera or side on with arm across the boobs.


Yes these are ok, and don't get me started on the celeb pics - so what is different?


I am a gurly crossdresser, a gay guy in panties.... not a professional account, just me. 


I am infuriated that even when you appeal, they only select 'random' cases to review - how is it a fair and open system if they chose which appeals to even look at?


Don't get me wrong, I am all for protecting the youth, protecting innocent people and in fact everyone from exploitation and abuse. But that should surely mean that the protection applies to all, that everyone is treated equally and to the same standards, that is all I ask for, all i want, all i would hope for and expect.

Anyway, this rant was caused by seeing this picture on IG, been there this 2019, and by far not the worst


And yet, this pic of me was removed as to sexually graphic, not reinstated at review and appeal not actioned! And got my account banned.